Idpol + queer class issues

 

On whether idpol is truly good or bad for the working class:

Possibly, depending on how the Left or Liberal 2.0ers responds. The  ore accuate answer, which is beyond the scope of this answer, is that there is not a lot of ground for optimism. 

This is because, the link between the working class and the Left and or proto Liberal 2.0ers was destroyed under neoliberalism, and it was in fact the post-Marxist left which invented this idpol in the first place.

Idpol can be seen as alright because it makes the elite look like absolutely weak and messed up clowns in the eyes of the common man/common woman. 

By some margin, the working class is either hostile or grudgingly indifferent towards idpol and everything that's associated with it. 

Idpol is the ideology of wealthy white America (or to Liberal 2.0ers at least the "right type of white people"). Furthermore, it doesn't just make them look foolish - it actually leads to the moral degeneration of the ruling class because they get high on their own supply. 

Good luck applying the woke theories that you learned at Bowdoin to the task of containing China or putting down a popular uprising, cretins -- you can't even handle "twitter abuse" for heaven’s sake!

We have to understand that in order to win over the masses, special consideration has to be made to workers who face super exploitation such as African American workers/BIPOC workers, women workers ,LGBTQ workers etc  

In his book Toward Soviet America, William Z Foster writes, “The capitalist class not only robs the workers as a whole, but it visits special exploitation upon those sections of the working class — Negroes, foreign-born, women, youth, the aged, etc. — who, for one reason or another, are the least able to defend themselves in the class struggle.” From the early days of left wing socioeconomic history, our leaders understood the relationship between class and special oppression."

We have to uplift and equalize the lower sexual classes through economic egalitarianism now and by abolishing the Heteronormative and Cisgender patriarchy afterward 

Anyway a big reason that I am generally fine and a-ok with regular idpol is the following: Idpol may not be rooted in materialist analyses but how people feel about themselves is ultimately a part of them. People have vices they can't control and they shouldn't be marginalized because of it

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Comminsm bad fposty

National- Bolshevism as a concept prompted by the victory of liberalism Philosophically, National-Bolshevism coincided with the parallel shift of paradigm that arrived with Post-Modernity. Post-Modern authors, coming mainly from the far left, became very critical of Soviet and partly Chinese style communism, and thus adopted the strategy of an ideological alliance – always more and more “anti-fascist” and as well anti-NB – with left liberals. So, Post-Modernism was established as a kind of common ground for ex-communists to become more and more liberal (individualist, hedonists and so on) and for left liberals to adopt the avant-guard epistemology of radical thinkers promoting extreme theories and practices of liberation – from rules, norms, stable identities, hierarchies, borders and so on. Here is where liberalism 2.0 has its roots. But in order to become explicit in the form of the new version of liberal political ideology, this took 30 more years of dramatic political life. The Tru...
Read more

Alteration media darkweb

Image
  "Envy plus rhetoric equals social justice."   Thomas Sowell This is called the Civ Liberaltarian Right  broad which is a big tent ideological descriptor  defining a bundle of movements which arerelatively    moderate  views and yet still maintaining a right wing resistance to mainstream politics. It is fiscally center-right to Laissiez Faire Left Liberal Third Way  ,civically variable and culturally center-right to Mises Caucus Paleolibertarian
Read more

Third way soci auth

Image
   Third Way Social Authoritatianism  Many authoritarian regimes followed    Third Way  economics, which in this type of variant is itself a ౺rth Position synthesis of    neoliberal  and    socially liberal /   socially democratic  economic policies. Authoritarian regimes which embrace the Third Way tend to implement deregulation, privatization, private-public partnerships, and   anti-poverty measures. Two notable example of this are   Eduard Shevardnadze in   Georgia and   Thaksin Shinawatra in   Thailand. It can be seen as a more pro-welfare version of    State Liberalism  (non  Succdem )౺౺
Read more